Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Ralf Tautenhahn
ParticipantI am having the same problem. I cannot find out the how to match the t2m to the image dimensions.
The 4800 imaging tool was used.In my example, the filesize is
10412992256Image dimension as reported by nifti-tools are:
$ nifti_tool -disp_hdr -infiles img.hdr
name offset nvals values
——————- —— —– ——
..
dim 40 8 4 15250 424 152 1 0 0 0
..
datatype 70 1 4The number of values int the t2m file is 80786 (file size 323144).
So the number of values is the t2m is 80786/15250 = 5.297443 times higher than the data dimension.
The datatype is 4 = signed short = 2 bytes
According to the file size 10412992256 / (424 * 152) / 2 bytes = 80786So it looks like the data dimension is 80786 (and not 15250), which would make sense with the t2m file. I understand that dimensionfor the ANALYZE format is limited to 32768 and it therefore shows a different value in the header.
But how can datatype 4,signed short, 2 bytes (2^16=65536) address 80786 m/z indices ?
I guess, binning is used ?
How can I find out the binning details (offset, bin size) ?Thank you for your help!
Ralf.
PS: Is there any plan to support imzML as an output format for the imaging tools ?
That would be really helpful and get rid of all these limitations of the ANALYZE file format. -
AuthorPosts